Information and Civil Unrest in Dictatorships (2024)

  • Beaulieu, E., & Hyde, S. D. (2009). In the shadow of democracy promotion: Strategic manipulation, international observers and election boycotts. Comparative Political Studies, 42(3), 392–415.

  • Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.

  • Bimber, B., Flanagin, A. J., & Stohl, C. (2005). Reconceptualizing collective action in the contemporary media environment. Communication Theory, 15(4), 365–388.

  • Blaydes, L. A. (2011). Elections and distributive politics in Mubarak’s Egypt. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Bob, C. (2005). The marketing of rebellion: Insurgents, media, and international activism. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Boix, C., & Svolik, M. W. (2013). The foundations of limited authoritarian government institutions: Commitment and power-sharing in dictatorships. Journal of Politics, 75(2), 300–316.

  • Brady, A. (2012). Market-friendly, scientific, high tech, politics-lite: China’s new approach to propaganda. In A. Brady (Ed.), China’s thought management (pp. 1–10). New York: Routledge.

  • Bratton, M., & van de Walle, N. (1997). Democratic experiments in Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Breuer, A. (2012). The role of social media in mobilizing political protest: evidence from the Tunisian revolution. German Development Institute Discussion Paper 10/2012. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2179030.

  • Brockett, C. D. (1993). A protest cycle resolution of the repression/popular protest paradox. Social Science History, 17(3), 457–484.

  • Brockett, C. D. (2005). Political movements and violence in Central America. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Bueno de Mesquita, E. (2010). Regime change and revolutionary entrepreneurs. American Political Science Review, 104(3), 446–466.

  • Bunce, V. J., & Wolchik, S. L. (2010). Defeating dictators: Electoral change and stability in competitive authoritarian regimes. World Politics, 62(1), 42–86.

  • Calingaert, D. (2006). Election rigging and how to fight it. Journal of Democracy, 17(3), 138–151.

  • Chwe, M. S. (2001). Rational ritual: Culture, coordination and common knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Collings, A. (2001). Words of fire: Independent journalists who challenge dictators, drug lords, and other enemies of a free press. New York: New York University Press.

  • Darling, J. (2008). Latin America, media, and revolution. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

  • DeNardo, J. (1985). Power in numbers: The political strategy of protest and rebellion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Dewan, T., & Myatt, D. P. (2008). The qualities of leadership: Direction, communication, and obfuscation. American Political Science Review, 102(3), 351–368.

  • Diamond, L. (2010). Liberation technology. Journal of Democracy, 21(3), 69–83.

  • Diamond, L. (2012). “Introduction” and “Liberation technology.” In L. Diamond & M. F. Plattner (Eds.), Liberation Technology: Social Media and the Struggle for Democracy (pp. ix–xxvi & 3–17). Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

  • Earl, J. (2003). Tanks, tear gas, and taxes: Toward a theory of movement repression. Sociological Theory, 21(1), 44–68.

  • Edmond, C. (2013). Information manipulation, coordination, and regime change. Review of Economic Studies, 80(4), 1422–1458.

  • Egorov, G., Guriev, S. M., & Sonin, K. (2009). Why resource-poor dictators allow freer media: A theory and evidence from panel data. American Political Science Review, 103(4), 645–668.

  • Esarey, A., & Qiang, X. (2011). Digital communication and political change in China. International Journal of Communication, 5, 289–319.

  • Francisco, R. A. (1993). Theories of protest and the revolutions of 1989. American Journal of Political Science, 37(3), 663–680.

  • Frantz, E., & Kendall-Taylor, A. (2014). A dictator’s toolkit: Understanding how co-optation affects repression in autocracies. Journal of Peace Research, 51(3), 332–346.

  • Frantz, E., & Stein, E. A. (2012). Comparative leadership in non-democracies. In L. Helms (Ed.), Comparative political leadership (pp. 292–313). Basingstoke, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Frantz, E., & Stein, E. A. (2016) Countering Coups: Leadership Succession Rules in Dictatorships. Comparative Political Studies, 1–29.

  • Freedom House. (2013). Detailed data and subscores 1980–2012. In Freedom House, 2013 Freedom in the World Data. Washington, DC: Freedom House.

  • Gandhi, J., & Przeworski, A. (2006). Cooperation, cooptation, and rebellion under dictatorships. Economics & Politics, 18(1), 1–26.

  • García-Avilés, J. A., Kaltenbrunner, A., & Meier, K. (2014). Media convergence revisited. Journalism Practice, 8(5), 573–584.

  • Garrido, M., & Halavais, A. (2003). Mapping networks of support for the Zapatista movement: Applying social-networks analysis to study contemporary social movements. In M. McCaughy & M. D. Ayers (Eds.), Cyberactivism: Online activism in theory and practice (pp. 165–184). London: Routledge.

  • Geddes, B. (2006). Why parties and elections in authoritarian regimes. Revised version of paper presented at the 2005 American Political Science Association Annual Meeting. Washington DC, September 1, 2005.

  • Geddes, B., & Zaller, J. (1989). Sources of popular support for authoritarian regimes. American Journal of Political Science, 33(2), 319–347.

  • Gehlbach, S., & Keefer, P. (2011). Investment without democracy: Ruling party institutionalization and credible commitment in autocracies. Journal of Comparative Economics, 39, 123–139.

  • Ginkel, J., & Smith, A. (1999). So You Say You Want a Revolution: A Game Theoretic Explanation of Revolution in Repressive Regimes. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 43(3), 291–316.

  • Gladwell, M. (2010). Small change: Why the revolution will not be tweeted. The New Yorker. http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/10/04/101004fa_fact_gladwell?currentPage=all.

  • Goldstein, J. (2007). The role of digital networked technologies in the Ukrainian Orange Revolution. Berkman Center Research Publication No. 2007–14, Berman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard University.

  • Goodwin, J. (2011). Why we were surprised (again) by the Arab Spring. Swiss Political Science Review, 17(4), 452–456.

  • Granovetter, M. (1978). Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 83(6), 1420–1443.

  • Guriev, S., & Treisman, D. (2015). How modern dictators survive: cooptation, censorship, propaganda, and repression. Centre for Economic and Policy Research (CEPOR) Working Paper DP10454. Available at http://www.cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=10454.

  • Haugbølle, R. H., & Cavatorta, F. (2011). Will the real Tunisian opposition please stand up? Opposition coordination failures under authoritarian constraints. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 38(3), 323–341.

  • Howard, M. M., & Roessler, P. G. (2006). Liberalizing electoral outcomes in competitive authoritarian regimes. American Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 365–381.

  • Howard, P. N., & Hussain, M. M. (2011). The role of digital media. Journal of Democracy, 22(3), 35–48.

  • Hudson, J. (2011, January 31). The ‘Twitter Revolution’ debate: The Egyptian test case.” Atlantic Wire.

  • Hussain, M. M., & Howard, P. N. (2013). What best explains successful protest cascades? ICTs and the fuzzy causes of the Arab Spring. International Studies Review, 15(1), 48–66.

  • Hyde, S. D. (2011). Catch us if you can: Election monitoring and international nor creation. American Journal of Political Science, 55, 201–462.

  • Kalathil, S. (2003). Dot.com for Dictators. Foreign Policy, 135(March–April), 42–49.

  • Kalathil, S., & Boas, T. C. (2003). Open networks, closed regimes. New York: Carnegie International Endowment for Peace.

  • Kavanaugh, A., Sheetz, S. D., Hassan, R., Yang, S., Elmongui, H. G., Fox, E. A., Magdy, M., & Shomemaker, D. J. (2013). Between a rock and a cell phone: Communication and information technology use during the 2011 uprisings in Tunisia and Egypt. International Journal of Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, 5(1), 1–21.

  • Kellam, M., & Stein, E. A. (2015). Silencing critics: Why and how presidents restrict media freedom in democracies. Comparative Political Studies.

  • Keller, J. (2010, June 18). Evaluating Iran’s Twitter Revolution. The Atlantic.

  • Kelley, J. (2011). Do international election monitors increase or decrease opposition boycotts? Comparative Political Studies, 44(11), 1527–1556.

  • Kendall-Taylor, A., & Frantz, E. 2014. Mimicking democracy to prolong autocracies. The Washington Quarterly, 37(4), 71–84.

  • Kenez, P. (1985). The birth of the propaganda state: Soviet methods of mass mobilization, 1917–1929. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Khawaja, M. (1993). Repression and popular collective action: Evidence from the West Bank. Sociological Forum, 8(1), 47–71.

  • King, G., Pan, J., & Roberts, M. E. (2013). How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. American Political Science Review, 107(2), 326–343.

  • Kuran, T. (1991). Now out of never: The element of surprise in Eastern European Revolution of 1989. World Politics, 44(1), 7–48.

  • Kuran, T. (1995). Private truths, public lies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Kurzman, C. (1996). Structural opportunity and perceived opportunity in social-movement theory: The Iranian Revolution of 1979. American Sociological Review, 61(1), 153–170.

  • Kushnir, B. (2004). Cães de guarda: Jornalistas e censores, do AI-5 à Constituição de 1988. São Paulo: Boitempo Editoral.

  • Kuzio, T. (2006). Civil society, youth and societal mobilization in democratic revolutions. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 39(3), 365–386.

  • Levitsky, S., & Way, L. (2002). The rise of competitive authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 51–65.

  • Lichbach, M. I. (1994a). Rethinking rationality and rebellion: Theories of collective action and problems of collective dissent. Rationality and Society, 6(1), 8–39.

  • Lichbach, M. I. (1994b). What makes rational peasants revolutionary? Dilemma paradox, and irony in collective action. World Politics, 45(3), 383–418.

  • Lichbach, Mark I. (1987). Deterrence or escalation? The puzzle of aggregate studies of repression and dissent. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 31(2), 266–297.

  • Lindberg, S. I. (2006). Opposition parties and democratisation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 24(1), 123–138

  • Linz, J. J. (2000). Totalitarian and authoritarian regimes. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

  • Little, A. T. (2012). Elections, fraud, and election monitoring in the shadow of revolution. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 7, 249–283.

  • Little, A. T. (2015). Communication technology and protest. Journal of Politics, 78(1). http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/683187?origin=JSTOR-pdf.

  • Lohmann, S. (1993). A Signaling Model of Informative and Manipulative Political Action. The American Political Science Review, 87(2), 319–333.

  • Lohmann, S. (1994). The dynamics of informational cascades: The Monday Demonstrations in Leipzig, East Germany, 1989‒91. World Politics, 47(1), 42–101.

  • Lohmann, S. (2000). Collective action cascades: An informational rationale for the power in numbers. Journal of Economic Surveys, 14(5), 655–684.

  • Lorentzen, P. (2013). Regularizing rioting: Permitting public protest in an authoritarian regime. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 8, 127–158.

  • Lorentzen, P. (2014). China’s strategic censorship. American Journal of Political Science, 58(2), 402–414.

  • MacKinnon, R. (2011). China’s “networked authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy, 22(2), 32–46.

  • Magaloni, B. (2008). Credible power sharing and the longevity of authoritarian rule. Comparative Political Studies, 41(4–5), 715–774.

  • Magaloni, B. (2010). The game of electoral fraud and the ousting of authoritarian rule. American Journal of Political Science, 54(3), 751–765.

  • Magaloni, B., Chu, J., & Min, E. (2013). Autocracies of the world, 1950–2012 (Version 1.0). Dataset, Stanford University.

  • Malesky, E., & Schuler, P. (2010). Nodding or needing: Analyzing delegate responsiveness in an authoritarian parliament. American Political Science Review, 104(3), 382–502.

  • Malesky, E., & Schuler, P. (2011). The Single-Party Dictator’s Dilemma: Information in Elections without Opposition. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 36(4), 491–530.

  • Marconi, P. (1980). A censura política na imprensa Brasileira, 1968–1978. São Paulo: Global Editora.

  • Mason, T. D., & Krane, D. A. (1989). The political economy of death squads: Toward a theory of the impact of state-sanctioned terror. International Studies Quarterly, 33(2), 175–198.

  • Masters, D. (2004). Support and nonsupport for nationalist rebellion: A prospect theory approach. Political Psychology, 25(5), 703–726.

  • McAdam, D., & Tarrow, S. (2010). Ballots and barricades: On the reciprocal relationship between elections and social movements. Perspectives on Politics, 8(2), 529–542.

  • Meier, P. P. (2011). Do “liberation technologies” change the balance of power between repressive states and civil society (PhD diss., Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Medford, MA). http://irevolution.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/meier-dissertation-final.pdf.

  • Miller, M. K. (2015). Elections, information, and policy responsiveness in autocratic regimes. Comparative Political Studies, 48(12), 1526–1562.

  • Milner, H. (2006). The digital divide: The role of political institutions in technology diffusion. Comparative Political Studies, 39(2), 176–199.

  • Morgan, P., Brock, J., & Foden, G. (2006). The Last King of Scotland. Film. Directed by Kevin Macdonald. Los Angeles: 20th Century Fox.

  • Morozov, E. (2009a). Moldova’s Twitter revolution is NOT a myth. Foreign Policy.

  • Morozov, E. (2009b). Iran: Downside to the “Twitter Revolution.” Dissent, 56(4), 10–14.

  • Muller, E. N., & Weede, E. (1990). Cross-national variation in political violence: A rational-action approach. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 34(4), 624–651.

  • Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence: A theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43–51.

  • O’Donnell, G. (1978). Reflections on the patterns of change in the bureaucratic-authoritarian state. Latin American Research Review, 13(1), 3–38.

  • Opp, K., & Roehl, W. (1990). Repression, micromobilization and political protest. Social Forces, 69(2), 521–547.

  • O’Shaughnessy, N. (2009). Selling Hitler: Propaganda and the Nazi brand. Journal of Public Affairs, 9(1), 55–76.

  • Polese, A., & Ó’Beacháin, D. (2011). The Color Revolution virus and authoritarian antidotes: Political protest and regime counterattacks in post-communist spaces. Demokratizatsiya, 9(2), 111–132.

  • Rasler, K. (1996). Concessions, repression, and political protest in the Iranian Revolution. American Sociological Review, 61(1), 132–152.

  • Remmer, K., & Merkx, G. W. (1982). Bureaucratic-authoritarianism revisited. Latin American Research Review, 17(2), 3–40.

  • Ritter, D. P., & Trechsel, A. H. (2014). Revolutionary cells: On the role of texts, tweets, and status updates in unarmed revolutions. In B. Grofman, A. H. Trechsel, & M. Franklin (Eds.), The Internet and democracy in global perspective: Voters, candidates, parties and social movements (pp. 111–128). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing Switzerland.

  • Ritter, E. H., & Conrad, C. H. (2016). Preventing and responding to dissent: The observational challenges of explaining strategic repression. American Political Science Review, 110(1), 85–99.

  • Rød, E. G., & Weidmann, N. B. (2015). Empowering activists or autocrats? The Internet in authoritarian regimes. Journal of Peace Research, 52(3), 338–351.

  • Rosenberg, T. (1987). Letter from Chile. Columbia Journalism Review, 26(3), 49–51.

  • Salehyan, I., & Hendrix, C. (2014). Social conflict in analysis database (Version 3.1). http://www.scaddata.org.

  • Salehyan, I., Hendrix, C. S., Hamner, J., Case, C., Linebarger, C., Stull, E., & Williams, J. (2012). Social conflict in Africa: A new database. International Interactions, 38(4), 503–511.

  • Santner, V. (2010). The SMS Revolution: The impact of mobile phones on political protest using the example of the EDSA II movement in the Philippines in 2001(Master’s thesis, Universität Wien). http://othes.univie.ac.at/9059/1/2010-03-28_0304108.pdf.

  • Schedler, A. (2002). The nested game of democratization by elections. International Political Science Review, 23(1), 103–122.

  • Schedler, A. (2006). Electoral authoritarianism: The dynamics of unfree competition. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

  • Schulz, M. S. (1998). Collective action across borders: Opportunity structures, network capacities, and communicative praxis in the age of advanced globalization. Sociological Perspectives, 41(3), 587–616.

  • Shadmehr, M., & Bernhardt, D. (2011). Collective action with uncertain payoffs: Coordination, public signals and punishment dilemmas. American Political Science Review, 105(4), 819–851.

  • Shirky, C. (2011). The political power of social media: Technology, the public sphere, and political change. Foreign Affairs, 90(1), 28–41.

  • Siegel, D. A. (2011). When does repression work? Collective action in social networks. Journal of Politics, 73(4), 993–1010.

  • Snider, E. A., & Faris, D. M. (2011). The Arab Spring: U.S. democracy promotion in Egypt. Middle East Policy, 18(3), 49–62.

  • Stein, E. A. (2013). The unraveling of support for authoritarianism: The dynamic relationship of media, elites and public opinion in Brazil, 1972‒1982. International Journal of Press/Politics, 8(1), 85–107.

  • Stein, E.A. (2016). Censoring the Press: A Barometer of Government Tolerance for Anti-regime Dissent under Authoritarian Rule. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 8(2), 101–142.

  • Stockmann, D., & Gallagher, M. E. (2011). Remote control: How media sustain authoritarian rule in China. Comparative Political Studies, 44(4), 436–467.

  • Thomas, K. A., DeScioli, P., Haque, O. S., & Pinker, S. (2014). The psychology of coordination and common knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(4), 657–676.

  • Tucker, J. A. (2007). Enough! electoral fraud, collective action problems, and post-communist colored revolutions. Perspectives on Politics, 5(3), 535–551.

  • Tufekci, Z., & Wilson, C. (2012). Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: Observations from Tahrir Square. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 363–379.

  • VonDoepp, P., & Young, D. J. (2015). Holding the state at bay: Understanding media freedoms in Africa. Democratization.

  • Vu, K. (2011). ICT as a source of economic growth in the information age: Empirical evidence from the 1996‒2005 period. Telecommunications Policy, 35, 357–372.

  • Weinstein, J. (2006). Inside rebellion: The politics of insurgent violence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Whitten-Woodring, J. (2009). Watchdog or lapdog? Media freedom, regime type, and government respect for human rights. International Studies Quarterly, 53(3), 595–625.

  • Whitten-Woodring, J., & James, P. (2012). Fourth estate or mouthpiece? A formal model of media, protest, and government repression. Political Communication, 29(2), 113–136.

  • Wintrobe, R. (1998). The political economy of dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • World Bank. (2014). World development indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://Data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators.

  • Wright, J. (2008a). Do authoritarian institutions constrain? How legislatures affect economic growth and investment. American Journal of Political Science, 52(2), 322–343.

  • Wright, J. (2008b). To invest or insure? How authoritarian time horizons impact. Comparative Political Studies, 41(7), 971–1000.

  • Zaller, J. (2003). A new standard of news quality: Burglar alarms for the monitorial citizen. Political Communication, 20(2), 109–130.

  • Zuckerman, E. (2011, January 14). The first Twitter Revolution? Foreign Policy. http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/01/14/the_first_twitter_revolution.

Information and Civil Unrest in Dictatorships (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Lidia Grady

Last Updated:

Views: 5769

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (65 voted)

Reviews: 80% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Lidia Grady

Birthday: 1992-01-22

Address: Suite 493 356 Dale Fall, New Wanda, RI 52485

Phone: +29914464387516

Job: Customer Engineer

Hobby: Cryptography, Writing, Dowsing, Stand-up comedy, Calligraphy, Web surfing, Ghost hunting

Introduction: My name is Lidia Grady, I am a thankful, fine, glamorous, lucky, lively, pleasant, shiny person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.